The Inflation Reduction Proposal: Can Congress Reduce Inflation?
If you're anything like me, you've been staying indoors as much as possible this summer to avoid the record-breaking heat wave. Unfortunately, if this applies to you, it also means you may be unable to avoid a news channel or two. Likely, you may have heard about the latest game of political football being played: the new Inflation Reduction Act that Congress is trying to pass to address the current financial situation.
While you may be aware that inflation has been running amuck, you may not be fully up to date on the details of this bill or how it may impact your daily life and financial planning. Even if you do not follow the news, this is one piece of legislation you'll want to follow.
Understanding the Inflation Reduction Act and Its Tax Planning Implications
Seemingly unassuming, the Inflation Reduction Act is a landmark bill that proposes to spend $260 billion on investments in climate and healthcare. The main goal of the proposal is to lower inflation by doing two things: increasing taxes and lowering costs, which essentially involves strategic tax planning. The rationale is that if you raise taxes on corporations and high-earning individuals, you will reduce the deficit.
In theory, large budget deficits decrease private borrowing, decrease net exports, increase interest rates, and ultimately result in higher taxes and inflation. Therefore, reducing deficits, in the shorter-term, should result in a smaller accumulated debt and less risk to long-term economic growth.
Increasing Taxes and Tax Planning
The Increasing Taxes portion of the legislation aims to impose a minimum tax rate on corporations with over $1 billion in income at 15%. The additional tax income is predicted to decrease the deficit by $313 billion, showcasing the importance of tax planning in the legislative process. It would also close an interest tax loophole for private equity and hedge fund managers that currently allows them to pay lower taxes on some compensation. The predicted additional tax income is $13 billion.
It would also allocate $80 million to the IRS over the next 10 years to make them more efficient at paying taxes. The real question is, will this legislation actually reduce the deficit?
Economic Experts Weigh In
Prominent economists like Joseph Stiglitz and Nobel Prize winner, Robert Solow, agree that the amount of money saved through this bill will be impactful. The bi-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has analyzed the data and concluded that the legislation is likely to reduce the deficit by over $100 billion over a span of 10 years. But who's to say?
Since the bill is still being hammered out, the number could be closer to $300 billion if the proposal's final taxation rules are adjusted. Also, it would increase the supply of oil reserves and national energy resources, thus reducing the demand drag causing inflation.
Naturally, there is huge debate around whether this bill will live up to its name. Conservatives are more inclined to say that it is nothing more than a huge tax increase and a further expansion of government. And that makes sense - why should they give Biden and Democrats kudos during midterm election season?
Also, many ask a fair question: isn't it the job of the Federal Reserve to moderate inflation, not Congress'? There are certainly limitations to what the House and Senate can do to enact fiscal policy. Legislating the economy by passing laws can work, but past attempts have had a limited effect.
A Step Towards Tax Planning for Inflation Reduction
To be objective, $100 billion, while not fantastically impactful, may provide some sort of short-term relief. A $100 billion net reduction would reduce the national deficit by about 4%. It's a start, but will the deficit be decreased enough to lower inflation? When analyzing the meticulously examined, well-supported arguments (both pro and con), the fairest judgment to render at this point is that the bill "could or might lower inflation... in some kind of way..."
Will it make as big a dent as it claims? There are simply too many factors at play in today's economic landscape to give a more definitive answer at this point. Also, there is the possibility that the bill will be tweaked further before it is passed. It is a step in the right direction, but its ultimate consequence remains to be seen.
The following diagram summarizes the components of the proposal: